Legal Opinion

Centrol, Inc. v. Morrow

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1992No. 17417Published

1Opinion of the Court

489 N.W.2d 890 (1992)

CENTROL, INC., of South Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

Kevin MORROW, Keith Parker, Lynn Maass, Agronomics, Inc., Crop Pro, Inc., Crop Patrol, Inc., Agritech, Inc., Pro AG, Inc., John Doe and XYZ Company, Defendants and Appellants.

No. 17417.

Supreme Court of South Dakota.

Argued December 2, 1991.

Decided August 5, 1992.

Rehearing Denied September 10, 1992.

Edward F. Fox, St. Paul, Minn., Thomas F. Burns, Watertown, co-counsel for plaintiff and appellee.

William E. Coester, Milbank, for defendants and appellants.

SABERS, Justice.

Defendants challenge the non-competition and…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Permann v. South Dakota Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance DivisionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Malcolm v. MalcolmSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Shaffer v. Honeywell, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Kunkel v. United Security Ins. Co. of New JerseySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Flockhart v. WyantSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API