Legal Opinion
Sunshine Park, Inc. v. Gulvin
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided July 2, 1943PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BübJjIng, S. C. C.
Motion has been made before me as a Supreme Court Commissioner for an order to strike the answer of the defendant in this cause of action. The following reasons are assigned: (a) the answer is sham; (b) untrue in fact; (c) frivolous; (d) insufficient in law; (e) interposed for the purpose of delay.
*283In support of the motion, affidavit of the assistant secretary of the plaintiff has been presented, and answering affidavits of Wallace C. Eoth, and of the defendant, Ward T. Gulvin, have been presented on behalf of the defendant.
The plaintiff in the cause of action demands…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Board of Education v. BrophyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1919
- Ahlemeyer v. MillerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1927
- Barnes v. P. D. Manufacturing Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
- Jacobson v. HaydaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
- Pathe Exchange v. Court of Common Pleas of Hudson CtySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hagaman v. Board of Education of WoodbridgeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
- Hagaman v. Bd. of Ed. of Tp. of WoodbridgeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
- Shuster v. BD. OF EDUCATION OF TP. OF HARDWICKNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952