Jojola v. Baldridge Lumber Co.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of defendants based upon a jury verdict arising out of a motor vehicle collision on East Menaul Boulevard in Albuquerque. We affirm.
A. The law of comparative negligence was not applicable.
This case came on for trial on the morning of December 9,1980. On the same day, the doctrine of comparative negligence was adopted in New Mexico. Claymore v. City of Albuquerque [96 N.M. 682, 634 P.2d 1234 (App.1981)]. The opinion stated that the rule adopted was applicable to “cases in which trial commences after the date on which this opinion…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Scott v. RizzoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
- Lena v. Morvant, Etc. v. Construction Aggregates CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- State v. HargroveNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
- Victor and Marie Perkins v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Morgan O'brien, Donald Sheehy, and David MizaurCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 1984
- Richardson v. RutherfordNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- Yardman v. San Juan Downs, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
- Stahl v. Sun Microsystems, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1991
- Corsetti v. Stone Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.