United States v. Roselius
Supreme Court of the United States
This was an appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Catron
John McDonogh claimed to be confirmed in a tract of land bounded in part by the river Mississippi; th ont being 40 arpens more or less; bounded on the upper side, by a line running back' from said river a distance of seventeen miles, and two hundred and twenty-seven perches, more or less, until it strikes the river Amitie, on a course by compass of north 35° west; on the lower side, by a line running back from said river Mississippi a distance of eighteen miles and twenty-two perches, more or less, until it strikes lake Maurepas, on a course by the compass of north nine degrees fifty minutes…
2Cited by8 opinions
- American Water Development, Inc. v. City of AlamosaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Maria De La Solidad De Arguello and v. The United States. The United States v. Maria De La Solidad De ArguelloSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
- Sullivan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
- Carrere v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
- Miller v. YatesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.