Legal Opinion

Gregory v. Easton Cotton Oil Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 15, 1915PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by plaintiff from Justice, J., at Spring Term, 1915, of Peb-QUIMANS. Tbe facts are sufficiently stated in tbe opinion of tbe Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Hoke, J".

Tbe facts in tbe case tended to sbow tbat, at tbe time of tbe occurrence, tbe defendant company owned and operated a cottonseed oil mill in tbe town of Hertford, N. C., and in connection therewith a cotton gin and press; tbat tbe gin and press were so constructed tbat tbe floor where tbe cotton was baled was 9 or 10 feet above a platform running along tbe building, and, as tbe cotton was pressed into bales, it was thrown by tbe bands from a door of tbe ginhouse down onto this platform, rolling as it might chance in tbe fall; tbat when tbe gin was being operated there was perhaps a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ramsbottom v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Ramsbottom v. . RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. Brewster v. Elizabeth City.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. Wade Ex Rel. Moore v. McLean Contracting Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  5. Ainsley v. John L. Roper Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wooten v. . HollemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API