Legal Opinion
Marsha Hatch Ingham v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 11, 1999No. 97-35729PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRABER, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff, Marsha Ingham, brought this action against defendant, the United States, seeking a tax refund of $362,632 under I.R.C. § 1041(a)(2) and damages for defendant’s alleged wrongful disclosure of tax return information in violation of I.R.C. § 6103(a). Plaintiff also alleged that defendant spoliated material evidence during her tax-related administrative proceedings. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of defendant on all claims. Plaintiff appeals, challenging the district court’s grants of summary judgment and various discovery rulings. We affirm.
F…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Old Colony Trust Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- San Pedro Hotel Co. v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Henderson v. TyrrellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
- Kenneth GAGER; Deanna Gager, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Joann C. Arnes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Mabe v. San Bernardino CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- A. Farber & Partners Inc. v. GarberDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2006
- Vons Companies, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Mabe v. San Bernardino CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Busch v. Dyno Nobel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.