Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Radford

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided December 20, 1982No. 39,506; ACM S24841Published

1ConcurrenceEverett, Chief Judge

Immediately after the Government rested, defense counsel stated: “At this time the accused would like to take the stand and tell his side of the story,” whereupon appellant was sworn and answered identifying questions asked by the trial counsel. Then the military judge remarked: “Pro*328ceed. Oh, you would just like to tell your story? All right.” Thereupon appellant gave an uninterrupted narrative which occupies fifty-nine lines in the record of trial. At the conclusion thereof, the military judge stated: “Trial counsel. Your witness.” There followed cross-examination by the trial counsel, after…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. DuBayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  2. Jacqueline Lowery v. Harold J. Cardwell, Superintendent, Arizona State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  3. United States v. VietorUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
  4. United States v. KillebrewUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
  5. United States v. RadfordUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API