Tiley v. Grenada Building & Loan Ass'n

I am unable to concur in the majority opinion in this case for two reasons: (1) I think the contract here involved is controlled by chapter 136 of the Laws of 1916, which provides for exactly the scheme reflected by this litigation in the present case, and, being the latter act, repeals chapter 216-, Laws of 1914; and (2) if this law of 1916 does not repeal the act of 1914, and if the Act of '1914, chapter 216, is applicable, the said law is void for the reason that it is in conflict with the Constitution of the state, in that it violates sections 87 and 89 and paragraph (d) of section 9Q of…