Legal Opinion

Daley v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided September 16, 1949No. 26591PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By JONES, CJ.

This is a removed action for damages for personal injuries. It is alleged that plaintiff was injured when he slipped and fell on the sidewalk, abutting defendant’s store at West 110th Street in Cleveland. It is further alleged that plaintiff’s fall was caused by defendant’s negligence in failing to take steps to reduce the icy condition of the sidewalk which, plaintiff says, was created by the passage of many automobiles between the street and defendant’s parking lot. More particularly the complaint charges that: “* * * said auto traffic in its movements of stopping,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Abar v. Ramsey Motor Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  2. Bennett v. McGoldrick-sanderson Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Den Braven v. Public Service Electric & Gas Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1935

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Porter v. MillerOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Hallett v. Furr's, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance v. Timbalier Towing Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1980
  4. Daley v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1950
  5. Fischer v. Dover S. S. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API