Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Nightwine

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 3, 1994No. C92-2428DR; CA A79784PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

Wife appeals from a dissolution judgment that did not include husband’s retirement fund, which was derived from inherited money, as a marital asset to be divided between the parties and from the award of $300 a month in indefinite spousal support. We review de novo, ORS 19.125(3), and remand for entry of a modified judgment.

The parties were married 44 years. At the time of trial, husband was 62, and wife was 61. Both are in reasonably good health. There are two adult children. One son is hearing impaired and has lived with his parents, and now his mother, for the past several years. He…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Matter of Marriage of PiersonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Matter of Marriage of JenksOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Matter of Marriage of LemkeOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Matter of Marriage of BentsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  5. Matter of Marriage of Kopplin and KopplinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Marriage of BudgeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API