Legal Opinion

Matter of Marriage of Kopplin and Kopplin

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 17, 1985No. D82-1114; CA A30596PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, C. J.

Wife appeals and husband cross-appeals from a decree of dissolution. She argues that the trial court erred by not considering husband’s inheritance as a marital asset, by discounting some assets to allow for the uncollectibility of business accounts receivable, by deducting the costs of sale of real property and by not awarding interest on her $275,000 judgment against husband. He argues on cross-appeal that the court erred in the manner that it divided the property, by awarding permanent spousal support, by awarding wife attorney fees and by setting child support at $300 a month per child in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of McCoyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  2. Matter of Marriage of PiersonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. In Re the Marriage of HaguewoodOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of McCoyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Marriage of Kohler v. KohlerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  2. McDaniel v. McDanielAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  3. In Re the Marriage of BergCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
  4. In re BekooyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  5. In re Marriage of MilburnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API