Legal Opinion

Brett Hamilton v. Kitsap County

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 3, 2019No. 50570-3Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Filed Washington State Court of Appeals Division Two January 3, 2019 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II BRETT HAMILTON, a single individual, No. 50570-3-II Appellant, v. KITSAP COUNTY, UNPUBLISHED OPINION Respondent. MELNICK, J. — Brett Hamilton appeals from summary judgment in favor of Kitsap County on his claims of negligent supervision, negligent infliction of emotional distress (NIED), and retaliatory discharge. Hamilton argues the trial court erred in concluding no genuine dispute of any material fact existed on the negligent supervision claim or the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Thompson v. St. Regis Paper CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Marsha Godwin v. Hunt Wesson, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  4. Seven Gables Corp. v. MGM/UA Entertainment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Wilmot v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1991

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API