Legal Opinion
McFARLANE BY McFARLANE v. United States
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided May 11, 1988No. CV 87-1896 (RJD)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
DEARIE, District Judge.
This is a Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”) suit for damages allegedly sustained by an infant plaintiff and his mother, derivatively. The government has moved to reduce the ad damnum clause for the first cause of action in favor of the infant-plaintiff Fabian McFarlane to the amount stated in his administrative claim before the Federal Aviation Administration. 1 For the reasons stated below, the motion to reduce the ad damnum is granted.
FACTS
On August 5, 1986, plaintiff Fabian McFarlane, who was then twelve years old and visiting his aunt in West Palm…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Andrus v. Glover Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Locke v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1972
- Young v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1974
- Daniel Allan Woirhaye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Muldez v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Stokes v. U.S. Postal ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996