Legal Opinion
Oskin v. Johnson
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided November 7, 2012No. 27187PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Toal
Robert W. Oskin, Glenn Small, and Freddie Kanos (collectively “Appellants” or individually by last name) contest the Master-in-Equity’s ruling that the assignment of a note and mortgage on a Myrtle Beach property did not violate the South Carolina Fraudulent Conveyance Statute, S.C.Code Ann. § 27-23-10 (2007) (hereinafter the Statute of Elizabeth), and that a payment made to South Carolina Bank & Trust (SCB & T) did not result in a payoff of the amount due under the note and mortgage. We affirm.
Facts/Procedural Background
On April 27, 2005, Oskin entered into a contract to broker the sale of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Future Group, II v. NationsbankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- Pinckney v. WarrenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- First State Savings & Loan v. PhelpsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
- Colleton County Taxpayers Ass'n v. School District of Colleton CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Kinard v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014
- PCS Nitrogen, Inc. v. Ross Development Corp.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2015
- Arabi Gin Co. v. Plexus Cotton, Ltd. (In re Joseph Walker & Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2014
- Gordon v. LancasterCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2016
- Judy v. JudyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.