Legal Opinion
Griess v. Climax Molybdenum Co.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided April 24, 1980No. Civ. A. 79-K-1514PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KANE, District Judge.
The above-entitled action is here on defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Jurisdiction is proper by virtue of 28 U.S.C. § 1337. Plaintiff alleges that he was wrongfully terminated in violation of his rights under the Labor Agreement between defendant and the Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers International Union Local No. 2-24410. Plaintiff contends that as a result of the alleged wrongful termination he was unemployed for two years and has suffered emotional and psychological damage.
On November 19, 1979, defendant filed its motion for summary judgment which was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Barry L. Conrad v. Delta Air Lines, Inc. And Air Line Pilots Association, InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- United Mine Workers of America, District No. 2, and United Mine Workers of America, Local No. 1269 v. Barnes & Tucker CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- National Labor Relations Board v. Acker Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- Amalgamated Butcher Workmen Local Union No. 641 v. Capitol Packing Company, a Colorado CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bakers Union Factory, 326 v. ITT Continental Baking Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
- Ruskin v. Sunrise Management, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1981
- Knight v. PEOPLE OF STATE OF COLO.District Court, D. Colorado · 1980
- Louderback v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1980