Legal Opinion
In Re the Marriage of Watters
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided October 26, 1989No. 88CA1442PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge FISCHBACH.
In this action to protest activation of a wage assignment for child support, the trial court, although acknowledging the propriety of the assignment in part, upheld the objection with respect to the amount that could be lawfully withheld. In so doing, the court corrected a computational error made by the El Paso County District Attorney’s Office. Pursuant to § 14-14-107(9)(e), C.R.S. (1987 Repl.Vol. 6B), it also directed the District Attorney to reimburse the protesting party, James Eugene Watters, for a portion of the attorney fees he incurred in objecting to the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Johnson v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- City and County of Denver v. HolmesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1965
- Overland Development Co. v. Marston Slopes Development Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1989
- Alessi v. HogueColorado Court of Appeals · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Borquez v. Robert C. Ozer, PCColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
- Odenbaugh v. County of WeldColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
- Langseth v. County of ElbertColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
- Board of County Commissioners of Arapahoe v. Crystal Creek Homeowners Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- In Re the Marriage of TroutColorado Court of Appeals · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.