Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Mosley

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided August 25, 1995No. 94-0245; CMR No. 30042Published

1DissentCrawford, Judge

28. I respectfully dissent. I would hold that the military judge abused his discretion in ordering additional testing because appellant had not met his burden to demonstrate the necessity for such expert assistance. While I agree that a judge should be given wide latitude in discretionary decisions, he or she must base decisions in logic as well as in the law.

29. Here, the judge did not require any threshold showing of necessity other than a showing that the retesting was relatively simple and inexpensive. There was no showing that this retesting would support or had any relevance to any…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Caldwell v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Carzell Moore v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  5. United States v. GarriesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API