Legal Opinion

Ragen v. Hancor, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided January 29, 2013No. Case No. 3:08 CV 1022PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KATZ, District Judge.

Plaintiff William Ragen (who does business as Ragen Associates) spent twenty years as a manufacturer’s representative, selling pipe and related drainage products made by defendant Hancor, Inc. During those years, the relationship evolved and changed in several ways. The parties started with a written contract in 1988 and updated it in writing in 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, and 2001. The parties also frequently modified the terms of the sales *815relationship, usually by Hancor telling Mr. Ragen that it was adding or removing territory, customers, and…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Golden v. ZwicklerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. 60 Ivy Street Corporation (86-5500), and Coldwell Banker Commercial Group, Inc., (86-5517) v. R.C. Alexander and Doris AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chiquita Fresh North America, L.L.C. v. Greene Transport Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2013
  2. Meyer v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
  3. Nationwide General Insurance Company v. Caudill (PLR2)District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2020
  4. Yost Foods, Inc. v. Bunge North America, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API