Legal Opinion

Grand Leasing Co. v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1986PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Sidney Leviss, J.

In this CPLR article 78 proceeding, petitioners seek to annul the determination of the respondent dated February 26, 1986 which denied their applications for alternative hardship rent increases.

Petitioners were each owners and then sponsors of buildings which were converted to cooperative ownership. They remain the holders of all unsold shares in the cooperative. Applications were filed by petitioners for increased rents for these *134rent-stabilized apartments pursuant to Administrative Code of the City of New York § YY51-6.0 (c) (6-a) (presently renum by L…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Howard v. WymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Colton v. BermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. Plaza Management Co. v. City Rent AgencyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  4. MATTER OF PLAZA MGMT. CO. v. City Rent AgencyNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Fazio v. JoyNew York Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cier Industries Co. v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalNew York Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Grand Leasing Co. v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API