Legal Opinion

United States v. Jess E. Francis

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 28, 1963No. 17607PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARNES, Circuit Judge.

This is an action in which the United States (appellant) seeks restitution under Section 322 of the Transportation Act of 1940, 29 U.S.C. § 66, for over-payments allegedly made by it on twenty-seven charges rendered by appellee, operating as the Continental Freight Lines.

The district court, having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1345, on April 28, 1961 entered judgment holding for appellant on twelve of the twenty-seven asserted overpayments, and for appellee carrier on the remaining fifteen; nine of these remaining fifteen are the basis of this appeal.

This court has…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Public Util. Comm'n of Cal. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. United States v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Davis v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  2. Jetco, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
  3. Von Der Ahe Van Lines, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  4. Charles Patterson, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
  5. Union Pacific Railroad v. Madison Foods, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API