Legal Opinion

Eileen Bransten v. State of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 21, 2017No. 67Published

1Opinion of the Court

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. ----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 67 Eileen Bransten, &c., et al., Respondents, v. State of New York, Appellant. Judith N. Vale, for appellant. Alan M. Klinger, for respondents. PER CURIAM: The issue presented on this appeal is whether Civil Service Law § 167 (8), as amended, authorizing a reduction of the State's contribution to health insurance benefits for State employees, including members of the State judiciary, violates the Judicial Compensation Clause of…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Hibbs v. WinnSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. United States v. WillSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. United States v. HatterSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. United States v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. People Ex Rel. McClelland v. . RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1896

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API