Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Northwestern National Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 24, 1917No. Civ. No. 1993PublishedCited by 10 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

BEASLY, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from a judgment for plaintiff upon a policy of insurance written by defendant in favor of plaintiff. At the time the policy was issued the plaintiff owned a grocery-store in a one-story frame building in Alameda County. About three months after the date of the policy, a small shed was erected upon the same property with the store covered by the policy. Into this shed a part of the stock of groceries of the store were placed and kept. The shed was subsequently burned.

The trial court found that the shed was an addition to the store within the meaning of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Victoria Steamship Co. v. Western Assurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Marsh v. Concord Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1902

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Joseph E. Bennett Co. Inc. v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  2. Zimmerman v. Continental Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Meyerstein v. Great American InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. Gee v. Fong PoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Pacific Employers Insurance v. Arenbrust, Farahan & LoranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API