Legal Opinion

Essner v. Shoemaker

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 30, 1958No. Appeal, 176PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Cohen,

This appeal is from the dismissal of plaintiff’s complaint in equity praying for specific performance of an oral contract allegedly made with the defendants, Samuel, Charles L. and Daniel M. Tabas, assigning their interests in certain Philadelphia real estate to plaintiff.

In 1951 the defendants Ellwood P. Shoemaker and his wife entered into a written agreement to sell a 75 acre tract of land located in Philadelphia to the nominee of defendant Elizabeth Stevens, the straw-party for the defendant Tabases. The time of settlement under the agreement was extended by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Stanley Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Upsal Street Realty Co. v. RubinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Onyx Oils & Resins, Inc. v. MossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. GOLDMAN v. McShainSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Mazzella v. KokenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Krause v. Great Lakes Holdings, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Robert D. Schulman, T/a Maxi's Express v. J.P. Morgan Investment Management, Inc. Widener Funding Corp., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  5. Degenhardt v. Dillon Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API