Legal Opinion · Dissent

Walls v. Kim

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 4, 2001No. A01A0034Published

1DissentRuffin, Judge

I concur with almost all of the majority opinion, except for the result. Were it not for Cohen v. Baxter,7 I would concur fully. However, pretermitting what I, as a former trial judge, may believe to be “the better practice,” as an appellate judge, I must follow different *262rules. One such rule is that of stare decisis. Indeed, this principle serves as the bedrock of our common law system. I recognize that stare decisis is commendable where appropriate and that it serves a useful purpose in our jurisprudence. Moreover, I recognize that we should not become prisoners of precedent and that stare…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cohen v. BaxterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  2. Eady v. Capitol Indemnity Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  3. Hardy v. Tanner Medical Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  4. Luke v. SuberCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  5. Stewart v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API