Publication

Phytase in Pig Diets: Technical and Economic Evaluation

Danilo de Souza Sanches, Charles F. Kiefer, Ricardo Carneiro Brumatti, Karina Marcia Ribeiro de Souza Nascimento, Luan Souza Santos, Anderson Corassa, Elis Regina de Moraes Garcia, Gislaine da Cunha de Andrade and 1 more

AnimalsJun 3, 2026
Abstract

Despite the widespread use of phytase in swine diets, there is a need to update the current evidence on its effects on performance, carcass traits, and economic outcomes. This meta-analysis evaluated the impact of phytase supplementation on growth performance, carcass traits, and economic returns in growing–finishing pigs, combining meta-analysis with economic modeling. A systematic review (Web of Science, ScienceDirect, PubMed, and Scopus) revealed 1049 studies, 17 of which met the inclusion criteria (PRISMA). Three treatments were considered: a basal diet (BD), a reduced-P diet without phytase (DRP), and a reduced-P diet with phytase (DRP + P), with effect sizes expressed as weighted mean differences (WMDs). The meta-analysis included performance traits (daily feed intake, DFI; daily weight gain, DWG; feed conversion, FC; and final weight, FW) and carcass traits (carcass weight, CW; carcass yield, CY; backfat thickness, BT; loin eye area, LEA; lean meat percentage, LMP; and lean meat yield, LMY). With respect to BD vs. DRP, P reduction impaired performance and decreased ADG, DFI, and final weight (p < 0.001), especially at reductions ≥0.12%. In DRP + P vs. BD, phytase had no significant effects on performance (WMD = 0.008 kg/day) or carcass traits. In DRP + P vs. DRP, phytase improved performance (ADG: +0.068 kg/day; DFI: +0.106 kg/day; FW: +4.630 kg; FC: −0.115; p < 0.001), with stronger effects in males and at greater P reductions. In DRP + P vs. DB, carcass traits were not significantly affected, whereas DB vs. DRP reduced LEA (WMD = −1.820, p < 0.00), and DRP + P vs. DRP produced subgroup-dependent changes in CW, LEA, and LMY according to sex, phytase source, and diet composition. Economically, phytase increased profit by up to US$ 2.66 (vs. BD) and US$ 5.14 (vs. DRP), remaining advantageous even with enzyme price increases of up to 4×. Overall, phytase supplementation improved performance and economic returns, representing an effective strategy for the development of swine production systems.

1Authors

AuthorAffiliationh-indexCitations
Danilo de Souza SanchesUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul318
Charles F. KieferUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul13759
Ricardo Carneiro BrumattiUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul10341
Karina Marcia Ribeiro de Souza NascimentoUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul00
Luan Souza SantosUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul00
Anderson CorassaUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso10471
Elis Regina de Moraes GarciaUniversidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul9371
Gislaine da Cunha de AndradeUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul39

Showing the abstract — retrieve the full paper via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API