Publication

Validation of 13 102 International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes using a large language model-based system

Yichen Wang, Yilin Song, Rex K. Siu, Induja R. Nimma, Yan Yan, Thomas Savage, Yiming Wang, Zhichen Li and 6 more

Journal of the American Medical Informatics AssociationJan 14, 2026
Abstract

ObjectivesTo comprehensively evaluate the validity of International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes for both prevalent diagnoses and less common diseases, and to assess the performance of a large language model (LLM)-based system in validating these codes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed hospital admissions from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database. We developed a validated LLM-based system using GPT-4o, refined through iterative prompt engineering, to assess ICD-10-CM code validity. We measured the positive predictive value (PPV) of ICD-10-CM codes, PPV of principal and secondary diagnoses, and the performance of an LLM-based system in code validation.

ResultsAmong 865 079 assigned codes, the PPV was 84.6% (95% CI, 84.5%-84.6%). Principal diagnoses had a PPV of 93.9% (95% CI, 93.7%-94.1%), while secondary diagnoses had a PPV of 83.8% (95% CI, 83.7%-83.9%). The LLM system demonstrated high performance in validating ICD codes, achieving 93.6% accuracy, 95.4% sensitivity, and 85.2% specificity. Among correctly assigned secondary diagnoses, the majority (67.9%) represented historical or baseline conditions, while 32.1% reflected active conditions that deviated from baseline status; 22.3% of these emerged after hospital admission. PPV decreases with later diagnosis positions, with the largest decline occurring between principal and secondary diagnoses. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: In this large-scale evaluation, ICD-10-CM codes exhibited generally high accuracy, though variability existed by position and condition type. A validated LLM system performed comparably to physician review and offers a scalable means to improve coding accuracy. These findings support the potential for integrating LLM-based auditing into routine workflows to strengthen the quality of administrative and research data.

1Authors

AuthorAffiliationh-indexCitations
Yichen WangMayo Clinic in Florida10327
Yilin SongUniversity of Maryland Medical Center210
Rex K. SiuMayo Clinic in Florida214
Induja R. NimmaMayo Clinic in Florida342
Yan YanMayo Clinic in Florida302,696
Thomas SavageUniversity of Pennsylvania10545
Yiming WangMayo Clinic in Florida12
Zhichen LiPonte Vedra High School , Ponte Vedra, FL 32081,12

Showing the abstract — retrieve the full paper via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API

See something wrong or missing on this page?