Abstract
In tightly managed tests, AI that gives each student a learning path tailored to them shows improvements of 0.42 to 0.76 standard deviations. However, this review of 22 studies (1984-2026) examines an overlooked aspect: the quality of the actual learning space. Barrett et al. (2015) found that classroom design explains 16% of the variation in student performance, about the same as the impact of the AI itself. We believe that temperature, noise, and lighting all make it harder for students to manage their own learning, and AI that adapts to students' needs requires self-direction to work
Showing the abstract — retrieve the full paper via the Exa API.
Authors
Aabhushan GyawaliAhmed Abdulhakim Al-AbsiBaseem Al-athwari
Topics
Online Learning and AnalyticsEducational Environments and Student OutcomesLearning Styles and Cognitive DifferencesSystematic reviewComputer science