Who’s talking
9 speakersTranscript
15 turns · 6 minSo good, so good, so good.
New summer arrivals are at Nordstrom Rack stores now. Get ready to save big with up to sixty percent off brands like Rag & Bone, Levi's, Adidas, and Free People. Join the Nordie Club to unlock exclusive discounts, shop new arrivals first, and more. Plus, buy online and pick up at your favorite Rack store for free. Great brands, great prices. That's why you Rack.
[beep] Hello, and welcome to Pluto Phone. If you know the name of the movie you'd like to see, just stream it for free on Pluto TV, where all your blockbuster favorites are landing all summer long. [beep] Catch Anchorman: The Legend of Ron Burgundy.
Fantastic.
[beep] Men in Black, one through three.
That's what I'm talking about.
[beep] Mean Girls.
Shut up.
Titanic.
I'm the king of the world.
And so much more. For showtimes, press nothing. They're free 24/7.
That is so fetch.
On Pluto TV. Stream now, pay never. [dramatic music]
[clapping] I'd like to talk to you today about the scale of the scientific effort that goes into making the headlines you see in the paper. Headlines that look like this when they have to do with climate change, and headlines that look like this when they have to do with air quality or smog. They're both two branches of the same field of atmospheric science. Recently, the headlines looked like this when the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, or IPCC, put out their report on the state of understanding of the atmospheric system. That report was written by six hundred and twenty scientists from forty countries. They wrote almost a thousand pages on the topic, and all of those pages were reviewed by another four hundred plus scientists and reviewers from a hundred and thirteen countries. It's a big community. It's such a big community, in fact, that our annual gathering is the largest scientific meeting in the world. Over fifteen thousand scientists go to San Francisco every year for that. And every one of those scientists is in a research group, and every research group studies a wide variety of topics. For us at Cambridge, it's as varied as the El Nino oscillation, which affects weather and climate, to the assimilation of satellite data, to emissions from crops that produce biofuels, which is what I happen to study. And in each one of these research areas, of which there are even more, there are PhD students like me, and we study incredibly narrow topics, things as narrow as a few processes or a few molecules. And one of the molecules I study is called isoprene, which is here. It's a small organic molecule, probably never heard of it. The weight of a paperclip is approximately equal to nine hundred zeta illion, ten to the twenty-first, molecules of isoprene. But despite its very small weight, enough of it is emitted into the atmosphere every year to equal the weight of all the people on the planet. It's a huge amount of stuff. It's equal to the weight of methane, and because it's so much stuff, it's really important for the atmospheric system. Because it's important for the atmospheric system, we go to all lengths to study this thing. We blow it up and look at the pieces. This is the EUFA Smog Chamber in Spain. Atmospheric explosions or
Episode notes
View full lesson: http://ed.ted.com/lessons/rachel-pike-the-science-behind-a-climate-headline
In 4 minutes, atmospheric chemist Rachel Pike provides a glimpse of the massive scientific effort behind the bold headlines on climate change, with her team -- one of thousands who contributed -- taking a risky flight over the rainforest in pursuit of data on a key molecule.
Talk by Rachel Pike.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices