Legal Opinion

United States v. Roller

Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided March 31, 2016No. NMCCA 201600008PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Senior Judge KING and Judge MARKS concur.

PUBLISHED OPINION OF THE COURT

PALMER, Judge:

A military judge, sitting as a special court-martial, convicted the appellant, pursuant to his pleas, of one specification of making a false official statement and one specification of larceny in violation of Articles 107 and 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 907 and 921; The court sentenced the appellant to 90 days’ confinement, reduction to pay grade E-4, and a bad-conduct discharge. The convening authority (CA) approved the adjudged sentence and, pursuant to a pretrial agreement,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. NeradCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010
  2. United States v. WheelusCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
  3. United States v. KhoCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  4. United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
  5. United States v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. BannisterNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2016
  2. United States v. CapleNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2018
  3. United States v. CarthanNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017
  4. United States v. GiacintiNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017
  5. United States v. LevrieNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API