Moss v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Mikell, Judge.
After a jury trial, Ricardo Moss was convicted of aggravated assault and possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime and sentenced to a total of fifteen years for both offenses, five of which would be served in confinement and the remainder on probation. On appeal, Moss argues that he is entitled to a new trial because the trial court improperly allowed the prosecutor to inject extrinsic and prejudicial information during his closing argument and because there was insufficient evidence of his guilt. We affirm.
On appeal from a criminal conviction, we view the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Conner v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
- Hudson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
- Roberts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Cooper v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1990
- McLeod v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gibson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
- Hunter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- Cantrell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- Cantrell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008