Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Cook v. Michigan Mutual Liability Company
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided December 5, 1972No. 272A83Published
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
*355Opinion Concurring in Part; Dissenting in Part
Staton, J.
I concur with the majority in affirming the trial court’s judgment as to Michigan Mutual Liability Company. When this cause of action arose, IC 1971, 27-7-6-6; Ind. Ann. Stat. § 39-4318 (Burns 1971 Supp.) was not in effect. Therefore, the majority opinion of this court makes no determination of its effect upon the merits in this action. IC 1971, 27-7-6-6; Ind. Ann. Stat. § 39-4318 (Burns 1971 Supp.) provides:
“Notice of intention not to renew. — No insurer shall fail to renew a policy unless it shall mail or deliver to the named insured,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- City of Fort Wayne v. BishopIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
- Brannock v. FletcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Ralya v. E. C. Atkins & Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1901
- Ross v. Review Board of Indiana Employment Security DivisionIndiana Supreme Court · 1962
- Cook v. Michigan Mutual Liability CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.