Legal Opinion

Smith v. Hutchins

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1977No. 8745PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*432OPINION

By the Court,

Thompson, J.:

This appeal from summary judgment for defendant places before us the propriety of applying the rule which precludes a plaintiff from splitting his cause of action for personal injury and property damage occurring simultaneously and traceable to a single tort to a case where one element of the plaintiff’s damage (usually property) is the subject of insurance.

The plaintiff commenced a district court action to recover damages in excess of $10,000 for personal injury, medical and hospital expense, and property loss sustained in a vehicle collision with defendant.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Reardon v. AllenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  2. Reno Club, Inc. v. HarrahNevada Supreme Court · 1953
  3. VALLEY POWER COMPANY v. Toiyabe Supply Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1964

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Delew v. WagnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  2. Alexander v. ElzieMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  3. American Home Assurance Co. v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Marcuse v. Del Webb Communities, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2007
  5. McDonald v. Southeastern Fidelity Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API