Legal Opinion

Golden v. State

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1870PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Montgomery. Tried below before the Hon.N. Hart Davis. There is no statement of facts in the transcript, but the ‘opinion states all that are material to the rulings made.

1Opinion of the CourtLindsay, J.

In all cases of misdemeanor, when the defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction, he must either enter into a recognizance to appear before the District Court from term to term, to abide the decision of the Supreme Court on the appeal, or pay the fine, or go to jail. Ho judgment, in a case of misdemeanor, is authorized to be brought to this court by a writ of error. Such a method is neither provided for in the constitution nor by statute. When the recognizance is entered into, it suspends all further action in the District Court until the appeal is disposed of in the Supreme Court. If…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mathews v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Early v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1876
  3. Coates v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1877

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API