Legal Opinion · Concurrence

G.C. v. Department of Children & Families

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 4, 2002No. 5D01-2758Published

1Concurrence

ORFINGER, R. B.,

concurring and concurring specially.

I concur with the court’s opinion because I am constrained to follow Anderson v. Glass, 727 So.2d 1147 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999), wherein we adopted a “thirty-day rule or be disqualified” interpretation of Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.160(f). While I agree with Anderson that “prompt rulings [on disqualification motions] promote public confidence in the impartiality of the trial judge,”11 do not believe that a thirty-day bright line test is either authorized by the rule or necessary.2

In Anderson, we emphasized that trial judges must…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tarrant v. JacoboniDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  2. Anderson v. GlassDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  3. Roy v. TomlinsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API