Legal Opinion

In Re Remington

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine

Decided July 12, 2004No. 19-20133PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

JAMES B. HAINES, JR., Bankruptcy Judge.

Before me on stipulated facts is Katrina Remington’s motion to avoid a judicial lien held by Evergreen Federal Credit Union. She contends the lien impairs her residence exemption. Because Evergreen’s lien became fixed to the real estate before Katrina obtained her interest in it, I conclude that she cannot successfully wield § 522(f)’s lien avoidance powers. 1

Introduction

Katrina’s motion raises issues involving the interplay of Maine marital property law, Maine debtor/creditor law, and the Bankruptcy Code. In a different context,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Farrey v. SanderfootSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Educational Credit Management Corp. v. PolleysCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  5. Garran v. SMS Financial V, LLC (In Re Garran)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cadle Co. v. Banner (In Re Banner)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
  2. In Re SkorichUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API