Legal Opinion

Gilbert v. Balkcom

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 7, 1961No. 21297PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Mobley, Justice.

“No person shall be discharged upon the hearing of a writ of habeas corpus in the following cases, to wit: . . . By reason of any misnomer in the warrant or commitment, where the court is satisfied that the party detained is the party charged with the offense.” Code § 50-116. Held:

Under the facts of this case the court did not err in denying the writ of habeas corpus. Williams v. Sipple, 178 Ga. 61 (172 SE 62).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Thomas B. Gilbert, pro se. Eugene Cook, Attorney-General, Earl L. Hickman, Assistant Attorney-General, contra.

The record shows…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Williams v. SippleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Shelton v. GrimesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API