Legal Opinion

Wiley v. Gypsy Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 13, 1925No. 15911PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

SHACKELFORD, C.

The plaintiff in error was the plaintiff in the trial court; and the defendant in error was the defendant. The parties will be referred to herein as plaintiff and defendant, as they appeared in the trial court.

This case involves the validity of an extension agreement extending an oil and gas lease upon the plaintiff's land. The plaintiff, Isabel Lewis, is a Creek freedman allot-tee, and to her was allotted, as a part of her interest in the lands of the Creek Nation, the east half of the northwest quarter of section 10, township 17 north, range 12 east, located in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Winona Oil Co. v. BarnesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Carlile v. National Oil & Development Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Cabin Valley Mining Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Papoose Oil Co. v. SwindlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Mallen v. Ruth Oil Co.District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carter Oil Co. v. FlemingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Bigpond v. PageSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Derrisaw v. SchafferDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API