Murrill v. . Murrill
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Mo.tioN of defendants, to. dismiss the-action heard at Pali Term, 1880, of Onslow Superior Court, before Gudger, J. The motion, was allowed and the plaintiffs appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtEuffiN, J.
A brief statement of'the case only is- needed,, that the point presented by the appeal may be understood.
The plaintiffs in the present action allege in their complaint that in 1851, Sarah I>. Murrill, Daniel E. Ambrose- and Mary J. Ambrose, being tenants in common of a certain parcel of land filed their petition in» the late court of equity for Onslow county for the sale of the same for partition, when a sale was decreed and made by one Jasper Etheridige, as a special commissioner of the court; that A.. J. Murrill who. was then the husband of the petitioner, Sarah D», became-the purchaser and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lord v. . BeardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
- Council v. . RiversSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1871
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hudson v. . CobleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
- Dula v. . SeagleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
- Crawford v. . AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
- Grant v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
- In Re PropstSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.