Legal Opinion
Hayden v. New Orleans Baton Rouge Steamship Pilots Fee Commission
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided September 27, 1996No. Nos. 96 CA 0062, 96 CA 0063PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IzWATKINS, Judge.
Plaintiff-appellants, Channing F. Hayden, Jr., George Duffy, Richard E. Manchester, and the New Orleans Steamship Association, appeal the dismissal of their petition for judicial review of a decision of the New Orleans-Baton Rouge Steamship Pilots Fee Commission (NOBR) increasing river port pilot rates. The trial court denied plaintiffs judicial review.
*1387BACKGROUND
Since colonial days, river pilots have performed pilot services for the passage of ships through the entrances of the Mississippi River and up through and including the port of New Orleans, Louisiana. The essential…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Matter of American Waste and Pollution Control Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Gulf States Utilities v. PSCSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
- Giallanza v. LOUISIANA PUBLIC SERV. COM'NSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
- Hendrix v. Louisiana Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Louisiana Insurance Rating CommissionLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hayden v. New Orleans Baton Rouge Steamship Pilots Fee CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
- Hayden v. New Orleans Baton Rouge Steamship Pilots Fee CommissionLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
- Hayden v. NOSS PILOTS FEE COM'NSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
- Provincial Hotels, Inc. v. MascairLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999