Legal Opinion

State v. Hankins

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 8, 2004No. C002213CR; A115703PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Defendant appeals his convictions on four counts of delivery of marijuana to a minor. ORS 475.995. He contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal on those counts. According to defendant, the indictment failed to allege in each of the counts essential elements of the offense, which were that he was at least 18 years old and three years older than the minor to whom he delivered marijuana. We affirm.

Defendant was a taxi driver who regularly transported S.I., who was 15 years old at the time. Defendant offered S.I. marijuana four times while driving him…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. WimberOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. RussellOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  3. State v. BurnettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. State v. WolfsOregon Supreme Court · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. HankinsOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. HankinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API