Legal Opinion · Dissent

Colson v. Steele

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1953No. 7833Published

1DissentKeeton, Justice

It seems to me all that is necessary to determine the issues presented in this matter is to read the pertinent parts of the Workmen’s Compensation Act and conclude that the Board was correct and its decision should be upheld.

While engaged in pistol practice, in nowise connected with the injured workman’s employment, and while performing no duty for the employer, due to misfortune or claimant’s own negligence, he received the injury complained of.

Claimant was employed as a member of a surveying crew. He was not employed to shoot jack rabbits or engage in pistol practice.

During the lunch…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Phil Hollenbach Co. v. HollenbachCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  2. Walker v. HydeIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
  3. In re LoperIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Eriksen v. Nez Perce CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Charon's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API