Legal Opinion

Beaty v. Armstrong

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 17, 1923No. 14154PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

This was an action to recover $1,000 which was supposed to have been deposited in defendant bank under a written agreement, which, in substance, recited : That J. H. Beaty, through his agent, O. D. Bryan, had purchased of James Armstrong an undivided one-half interest in the oil royalty from a 160-acre tract of land for $20,000. That $1,000 of the purchase price had. been deposited in the Guaranty State Bank to the credit of Armstrong; that deed from Armstrong to Beaty had been forwarded by the bank to Beaty, with da-aft attached for the balance of the purchase price of $19,000; that if Beaty…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McAlester v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Consolidated Flour Mills Co. v. File Bros. Wholesale Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
  2. Pierce v. C. I. T. Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Lorraine Petroleum Co. v. BartlettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  4. Board of Ed., City of Sapulpa v. BroadwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. Garr v. MinnickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API