Beaty v. Armstrong
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
This was an action to recover $1,000 which was supposed to have been deposited in defendant bank under a written agreement, which, in substance, recited : That J. H. Beaty, through his agent, O. D. Bryan, had purchased of James Armstrong an undivided one-half interest in the oil royalty from a 160-acre tract of land for $20,000. That $1,000 of the purchase price had. been deposited in the Guaranty State Bank to the credit of Armstrong; that deed from Armstrong to Beaty had been forwarded by the bank to Beaty, with da-aft attached for the balance of the purchase price of $19,000; that if Beaty…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- McAlester v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
3Cited by9 opinions
- Consolidated Flour Mills Co. v. File Bros. Wholesale Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
- Pierce v. C. I. T. Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Lorraine Petroleum Co. v. BartlettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Board of Ed., City of Sapulpa v. BroadwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Garr v. MinnickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.