Legal Opinion

Alward v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 14, 1924PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

This is an action of tort to recover compensation for personal injuries received by the plaintiff while upon a platform of a station of the defendant and entitled to the rights of a passenger. The plaintiff waited upon the platform where was to come the Mattapan car which she *245desired to take. There were berths, designated by numerals, along the platform where cars stopped for the purpose of discharging and receiving passengers. The time was about five o’clock in the afternoon. There was a crowd on the platform. While the plaintiff was thus waiting, a car stopped at berth No. 1; then a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kuhlen v. Boston & Northern Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  2. MacGilvray v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  3. Bryant v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  4. Stanley v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Martin v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  2. Waterman v. President & Fellows of Harvard CollegeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. River Excursion Company v. KuntzCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  4. Longin v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  5. Rottenberg v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API