Legal Opinion

Whigham v. Jackson Dawson Communications

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 27, 2014No. Appellate Case 2012-212258; 27440PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hearn

Stephen Whigham was injured playing kickball during an event he organized for his employer, Jackson Dawson Communications and filed a claim for workers’ compensation. The single commissioner denied the claim because she found the injury did not arise out of or in the course of his employment, and that decision was affirmed by the full commission and the court of appeals. We reverse and remand, holding that under the facts of this case, Whigham is entitled to workers’ compensation because he was impliedly required to attend the kickball game he organized, and therefore, his injury arose out of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. Shealy v. Aiken CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  3. Grant v. Grant TextilesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  4. Pratt v. Morris Roofing, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  5. Crisp v. Southco., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Davaut v. University of South CarolinaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2016
  2. Hartzell v. Palmetto Collision, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2016
  3. Nicholson v. S.C. Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2015
  4. Nicholson v. S.C. Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API