Killian v. Heinzerling
New York Supreme Court
Action to compel the specific performance of an oral agreement alleged to have been made by the plaintiff, with the defendant’s intestate.
1Opinion of the CourtMcCall, J.
This action is brought to enforce an oral agreement alleged to have been made between plaintiff and the intestate, Schellliase, whereby plaintiff was to receive the business of said intestate and chattels used therein, together with money or bonds amounting to $4,000 wherewith to conduct said business upon the consideration that she remain in his (Schellhase’s) employ for one year, or *513in the event of the death of intestate prior to the expiration of a year, then the said property to pass to her at his demise. The plaintiff was a young woman in the employ of John Schellhase, as superintendent…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hamlin v. . StevensNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Mahaney v. . CarrNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Rogers v. . RogersNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Pattat v. PattatAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Estate of DavisNew York Surrogate's Court · 1927
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Intermediate Account of Proceedings of BrownNew York Surrogate's Court · 1927
- In re Proceedings to Discover Alleged Property of BuoninfanteNew York Surrogate's Court · 1925