United States v. Hernandez-Noriega
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
ROBERT H. HENRY, Circuit Judge.
Jorge Hernandez-Noriega contends that the district court committed plain non-constitutional sentencing error when it applied a sixteen-level enhancement under USSG § 2L1.2(a) to his offense level, as required at the time under the Guidelines. For the reasons stated herein, we vacate Mr. Hernandez-Noriega’s sentence and remand for resentencing.
I. BACKGROUND
Mr. Hernandez-Noriega was convicted of reentry of a deported alien previously convicted of an aggravated felony, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a)(1)…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. Gonzalez-HuertaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. DazeyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Trujillo-TerrazasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.