Legal Opinion

United States v. Hernandez-Noriega

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 10, 2005No. 04-5037Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

ROBERT H. HENRY, Circuit Judge.

Jorge Hernandez-Noriega contends that the district court committed plain non-constitutional sentencing error when it applied a sixteen-level enhancement under USSG § 2L1.2(a) to his offense level, as required at the time under the Guidelines. For the reasons stated herein, we vacate Mr. Hernandez-Noriega’s sentence and remand for resentencing.

I. BACKGROUND

Mr. Hernandez-Noriega was convicted of reentry of a deported alien previously convicted of an aggravated felony, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a)(1)…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. United States v. Gonzalez-HuertaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. DazeyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. Trujillo-TerrazasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API