Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Newman

District Court, D. Montana

Decided September 26, 1979No. CV 77-58-GFPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

RUSSELL E. SMITH, District Judge.

The United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company (USF&G) issued a comprehensive *1030automobile policy to Earl H. Newman and Ray C. Newman, d/b/a Newman Construction Company, a partnership. Michael Newman, a son of Earl Newman, had an automobile accident on a purely personal trip, while driving a Ford pickup owned by Earl Newman individually. USF&G brought this declaratory judgment action to determine its liability under the policy, joining as defendants all of the persons who would benefit from the establishment of USF&G’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. D'ANGELO v. Cornell Paperboard Products Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Insurance Co. v. RussellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1962
  3. Murry v. Bankers Fire & Marine Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Rasmussen v. Western Casualty and Surety CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1964
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. American Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. NewmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  2. United States Fidelity And Guaranty Company v. Earl E. NewmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API