Legal Opinion

Oregon-Washington R. & Nav. Co. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 21, 1913No. 2,238PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States .for the Northern Division of the District of Idaho; Frank S. Dietrich, Judge. Action by the United States against the Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Company. Judgment for the United States, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

WOLVERTOÑ, District Judge.

This is an action under the 28-hour law to recover the penalty for confining a consignment of hogs carried in one car for a period exceeding 36 hours; a release having been signed by the shipper. The hogs were shipped, over the Northern Pacific Railway, at Stevensville, Mont., at 12:30 p. m., February 5, 1912, consigned to F. A. Stevens, Wallace, Idaho. The billing of the car was changed by the Northern Pacific agent at Wallace, by striking a line across the words “Wallace, Idaho,” and writing “Osborne, Idaho,” across the face of the waybill. The car arrived at…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Oregon-Washington R. & Nav. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1913

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Boston & M. R. R. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API