Legal Opinion

Nededog v. Colorado Department of Health Care Policy & Financing

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided August 12, 2004No. 03CA1005PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge WEBB.

In this judicial review of administrative action, plaintiff, Patricia Nededog, appeals the district court's judgment upholding a decision of defendants, Colorado Department of Health Care 'Policy and Financing (CDHCPF) and its executive director, Karen Reinertson, allowing the Larimer County Department of Human Services (County Department) to recover from her $5,795.40 in erroneously paid medical assistance (Medicaid) benefits. We affirm.

The initial decision of the administrative law judge (ALJ) concluded that the County Department could recover the erroneous Medicaid…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. People v. LutherSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  3. Regional Transportation District v. LopezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  4. Committee for Better Health Care for All Colorado Citizens v. MeyerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  5. Massachusetts Association of Older Americans v. Alexander Sharp, Ii, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Benuishis v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the StateColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Alliance for Colorado's Families v. GilbertColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Stevinson Imports, Inc. v. City & County of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Marshall v. Civil Service CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. People ex rel. D.C-M.S.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API