Legal Opinion

Scottish Heritable Trust v. Peat Marwick Main & Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 30, 1996No. 94-10952PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIENER, Circuit Judge:

Defendant-Appellant Peat Marwick Main & Co. (Peat Marwick) appeals from an adverse judgment following a jury verdict that Peat Marwick is liable to a third party for negligent misrepresentations contained in audit reports. Concluding that Texas law does not permit the plaintiffs to recover in these particular circumstances, we reverse the district court’s judgment and render a take-nothing judgment in favor of Peat Marwick.

I

FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

The plaintiffs in this case are The Scottish Heritable Trust, PLC (SHT/PLC) and SHT Holdings (US), Inc. (SHT(US)) (collectively,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Federal Land Bank Ass'n of Tyler v. SloaneTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Bily v. Arthur Young & Co.California Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Grumman Allied Industries, Inc. And Grumman Corporation v. Rohr Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  5. Airborne Freight Corp. v. C.R. Lee Enterprises, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1993

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Collins v. Morgan Stanley Dean WitterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  2. Great Plains Trust Co. v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  3. Barry C. Cosgrove, Cross-Appellee v. Joseph Bartolotta and Mary-Bart, Llc, Doing Business as Bartolotta's Lake Park BistroCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  4. Rankin v. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  5. Grant Thornton LLP v. Prospect High Income FundTexas Supreme Court · 2010

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API